| |
In his book Good to Great, Jim Collins
preaches the fact that to achieve greatness you need to get the
right people on the bus. That when all is said and done it boils
down to having the right people going the same direction as the
company and with sound leadership and coaching to make it all happen.
This same central theme was certainly apparent at the recently concluded
“Gathering of Eagles” sponsored for the 15th year by
Real Trends. Presenters discussed the importance of the people that
make up the real estate business and the importance of creating
an environment in which they can achieve success and greatness.
Yes, the conversation continued about how technology has and will
continue to alter the industry but the plain fact is that it is
not the panacea to the business of helping families sell and buy
their homes. Technology is another and major tool by which information
flows but the relationships that our agents foster and the relationships
that we as brokers continue to cultivate continues to be how this
business conducts itself.
Data from Real Trends gathered over the years and the recently completed
national study on Top Performing Companies points out some significant
barometric readings that should cause us all to re-focus our energies
and talent if we are going to keep the bus heading in the right
direction and make this a “great” business to call our
own.
First is the fact that last year (2002) the Real Trends 500 Largest
Brokers in America combined for over half of the total transactions
reported by the National Association of Realtors at 2,866,341 revenue
sides. The per person productivity was 11.9 revenue units per agent
for these same companies. These same Top 500 companies produced
2,641,137 units the previous year but averaged 12.22 units per person.
This productivity has not increased in the last 5 years. What have
we done with technology over the past 5 years?
We have added more brick and mortar (or was it granite and marble?)
and made our offices larger to accommodate agents with assistants
and the necessary space for the added technology. On average, our
offices have expanded from 39.6 agents per office five years ago
to 45.9 agents per office last year. The offices are doing more
transactions but the productivity per agent has not really gone
up. What has, somewhat artificially, propped up the agents is the
increase in the average sales price. But it should have. Haven’t
we had one of the strongest real estate market runs for the last
10 years?
Of significant note is a look at the top 100 brokers in the Large
Broker Report. These brokers reported an average of a 5 basis point
drop in commission per revenue unit and on average, last year’s
agent earned nearly $2000 less in gross commission dollar than in
2001.
Two of the many findings of the Top Performing Company report were
that there is a direct correlation between per person productivity
and profitability percentage of gross commission income. Profitability
showed no relationship to the size of the offices! Of further consequence
was the fact that the most profitable companies were either big
or small. There was not much room in the middle for profitability.
Did we already assume this? For years it has seemed that one had
to either shrink or stay highly concentrated in a given market or
grow to a size that simply overwhelmed all others. This assumption
has been born out.
But let’s talk per person productivity. Since the numbers
reflect a flat line over the years on productivity what are some
of the reasons and what would happen if we re-directed some of our
energy and resources to the area that matters the most? The agent
remains the greatest asset in this service business. Perhaps it
is time to develop a vision of where we want our agents to be and
not where we want our technology to go.
Larry Kendall of The Group in Ft. Collins Colorado shared his thoughts
at the concluding session of the Real Trends conference about vision
and focus. How athletes and others have achieved what many thought
was impossible or simply beyond one’s capabilities. If we
keep believing that productivity is a number that will never go
above 12 per agent….it never will. The Group is a 265 agent/owned
independent company that averages in excess of 25 units per person
per year and they are working on a vision and focusing on how they
are going to get that number even higher.
Jack Fry, owner of Remax of Reading (PA.) shared with the breakout
session on “Benchmarking” how he developed his vision
in 1994 in increasing his agent productivity. Last year his 94 agent
firm averaged over 40 units per person, tops in the To Performing
Company study.
Those who achieved or are on their way to achieve greatness and
performed at the 80th percentile in the To Performing Company Study
have set the standard. These companies, on average produced 26.7
units per person for 2002. It can be done. Re-focusing and creating
a new vision for our companies and raising the bar on acceptable
performance is where it has to start. It has to start with us. And
this new vision is not something that looks only to next year. These
may be 5-10 year goals. The challenge is to see that far into the
future of what we all want to achieve for our companies. When our
agents win and achieve their dreams then it seems that we achieve
ours as well.
2003 is half over. What do we want to make of our companies for
2010? What can we do with our resources (financial and human) to
get a better return on investment? Perhaps a shift from certain
line items to ones that become harder to measure except by human
performance. We need to recruit better people to our “bus”
and retain them more as valuable assets. We need to train them now
and on a regular basis and to “coach” them to higher
achievements. Our managers need to have an alternative mind set
and get rid of the “head trash” and believe in the vision
of the company and office. We need them doing less paperwork and
more peoplework.
The results can be measured. There may be little to notice in year
#1 but the results will pay enormous dividends for the future. What
better way to retain good people than to helping them achieve beyond
good to great!
|
|